The information showed that Texas being one of the bigger states in the United States was no surprise because of the high rate in people that received food supplements especially in 2010 with the economy and unemployment issue.
It was surprising to see the growth of grocery stores and how many accepted food benefits then versus most recent in 2018. After only two years (2020) and a pandemic going on, I bet this year's amount of people receiving food benefits would top all of these years, sadly. Along with the amount of places - grocery stores and restaurants that are accepting food supplements.
When analyzing the data, the graph for question 1 showed so many different ranges based off the counties and how many people were receiving food supplements in the most recent information, 2018. It was neat to see how different areas were, some may have barely had any people who received them, and then you get to a bigger county where the graph seemed to sky rocket.
The dataset and information could be improved because it was a bit difficult to understand and analyze everything that was included because it was just so much information for so many different places and so many different things all over the United States, but other than that, it does seem like the information got it's point of comparison across.